WriteToLearn FAQ
|
|
Clicking a link will scroll the page to the selected FAQ.
What is WriteToLearn?
What research has been conducted on WriteToLearn?
What are the benefits of using WriteToLearn?
For which grade levels is WriteToLearn appropriate?
Can I view a demonstration of WriteToLearn?
What are the technical requirements for using WriteToLearn?
How does WriteToLearn work?
What is the KAT™ engine?
Does WriteToLearn use keywords in its evaluation?
Are students required to type their responses directly into WriteToLearn?
How long does it take to score a response?
What is the Reading Comprehension Component of WriteToLearn?
How many reading passages are available? What topics or subject areas are covered?
What type of feedback do students receive on their summaries?
How does the Essay Component of WriteToLearn recognize a good essay?
How does the Essay Component scoring compare to the way teachers grade writing?
How does the Essay Component score essays with highly unusual writing styles?
What type of feedback do students receive on their essays?
|
| |
|
Q. What is WriteToLearn?
WriteToLearn is a complete online tool for building writing skills and
developing reading comprehension. Using WriteToLearn, students develop a
skill that good readers naturally possess - the ability to summarize what
they read. They practice essay writing and summarizing and build both
writing and reading comprehension skills across the curriculum.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. What research has been conducted on
WriteToLearn?
Significant research has been conducted examining both the Reading
Comprehension and Essay Components of WriteToLearn.
The Reading Comprehension Component has been demonstrated to
significantly improve
student writing skills. The summaries of students who used the Reading
Comprehension Component have been judged to be significantly superior
in blind
scoring by teachers than those of students who used a standard word
processing program. These students also received higher reading and
writing scores on the Colorado Student Assessment Program (CSAP) test.
Pearson has also conducted extensive research on the reliability and
validity of the Essay Component of WriteToLearn. The correlation between
the scoring of this component and human
graders has been shown to be as high or higher than that between two
independent human graders in dozens of studies with over 200 prompts of
every type. The correlation and agreement rates of the scores produced
by the Essay Component are better the more expert and reliable the human
scores. These scores have been shown to reflect progress in writing
skills and knowledge as a result of instruction much more sensitively
than human scores.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. What are the benefits of using WriteToLearn?
WriteToLearn gives students the opportunity to practice their
writing. The only way to learn to write is to practice with
informative feedback. The same goes for reading; the two are
inseparable. Learn to read and you learn to write, learn to write and
you learn to read. WriteToLearn provides the opportunity for students to
practice both of these valuable skills.
WriteToLearn is time efficient allowing teachers to
assign many more writing and reading comprehension assignments to
students without additional grading time.
WriteToLearn helps you focus your teaching. By
observing students and using the Teacher Reports you can discover both
individual and class strengths and weaknesses to help guide teaching.
WriteToLearn is flexible and easy to use. Teacher
tools allow teachers to set scoring thresholds, manage and evaluate
student progress easily, and to adjust the class roster and make
assignments.
WriteToLearn tutors students to improve subject knowledge,
as well as reading comprehension and writing skills by
providing detailed feedback on content.
WriteToLearn allows students to tackle more difficult reading
assignments by boosting their understanding and performance
through automated evaluation.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. For which grade levels is WriteToLearn
appropriate?
WriteToLearn includes writing and reading comprehension activities that
are appropriate for students in grades 4-12.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. Can I view a demonstration of WriteToLearn?
Yes, visit our Overview page to view an
animated flash overview or our Demo page for
an online demonstration.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. What are the technical requirements for using
WriteToLearn?
Minimum System Requirements
Windows
- Windows 2000, XP
- 128 MB RAM (minimum), 512 MB RAM (recommended)
- Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or higher, Firefox 2.0 or
higher
- Javascript enabled
- Flash plug-in 8.0 or higher
Macintosh
- MAC OS 9.2 (minimum), Latest version of OS X (recommended)
- 128 MB RAM (minimum), 512 MB RAM (recommended)
- Safari 1.3.2 or higher, Firefox 2.0 or higher,
Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.1 or higher
- Javascript enabled
- Flash plug-in 8.0 or higher
- Full functionality of the following features is available only in
Safari 1.3.2 or higher and Firefox 2.0 or higher:
- Text-to-Speech
- Roster Management
- Spelling and grammar
- The Teacher Comments feature is available only in Safari 1.3.2,
Safari 3.0 or higher and Firefox 2.0 or higher
Monitor Resolution
- 800 x 600 (minimum), 1024 x 768 (recommended)
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. How does WriteToLearn work?
WriteToLearn contains a Reading Comprehension Component and an Essay
Component. Both components use
the Knowledge Analysis Technologies (KAT)
engine, a patented technology based on over twenty years of research
and development. The KAT engine is based on the mathematical approach
known as Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), which provides a sophisticated
computer analysis of text. The Reading Comprehension Component
assesses the total content of a summary as well as the correlation
between the summary content and that of the original reading passage.
It compares the student's entire summary to each section of the
assigned reading and returns feedback indicating how well the
information in each section has been covered by the student's
summary. The Essay Component assesses the total content of an essay as
well as the correlation between the essay's content and that of
training essays previously scored by expert human readers. The Essay
Component assigns a score to each essay based in part on the similarity
of the content of the essay to that of the training essays.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. What is the KAT™ engine?
The KAT engine evaluates the meaning of text by examining whole
passages. The KAT engine is based on Pearson's
unique implementation of Latent Semantic Analysis, an
approach that infers semantic similarity of words and passages by
analyzing large bodies of relevant text. LSA can then understand the
meaning of text in much the same way as a human reader.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. Does WriteToLearn use keywords in its
evaluation?
A common misconception is that WriteToLearn scores by recognizing
keywords. It does not. If two or more different terms accurately
describe a concept, WriteToLearn will recognize either or both and
score them equally as well. For example, WriteToLearn measures
"Understanding is very important when you reading something
you want to know about"
as very similar in meaning to
"Comprehending's essential"
even though there are no literal words in common. Keyword based
similarity would find nothing in common between these two sentences.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. Are students required to type their responses
directly into WriteToLearn?
Students may type their responses directly into WriteToLearn if they
choose; however, many students choose to compose their responses in a
word-processing program and then copy and paste them into the
WriteToLearn interface.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. How long does it take to score a response?
Most responses are scored within a few seconds.
Keep in mind that a
slow or busy Internet connection may delay the scoring.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. What is the Reading Comprehension Component
of WriteToLearn?
Students summarize reading passages in their own words and the Reading
Comprehension Component of WriteToLearn automatically compares the
student's writing to the reading passage. The Reading Comprehension
Component compares the student's writing to each of the sections of the
text and provides immediate feedback about the content coverage of the
summary on a section-by-section basis. Additional feedback on the more
mechanical aspects of writing includes copying from the text, spelling,
repetition and inclusion of unimportant information.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. How many reading passages are available?
What topics or subject areas are covered?
Currently, we have several hundred reading passages available as part
of WriteToLearn. These reading passages cover subject areas ranging from
language arts to history to science and social studies. In addition,
WriteToLearn contains selected reading passages from Prentice Hall's
Science Explorer and World Studies textbooks as well as leveled readers
from Scott Foresman's Reading Street™ program.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. What type of feedback do students receive on their summaries?
Students receive feedback on their coverage of each section of the
reading. Students also receive feedback on spelling, copying from the
text, repetition and inclusion of unimportant information, as well as
on the length
of their summary. Feedback is displayed in a graphical report that
motivates students to continue to improve their summaries.
Click here to view a sample
student report.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. How does the Essay Component of WriteToLearn
recognize a good essay?
The Essay Component, using the KAT engine, assesses the content of an
essay, as well as more mechanical aspects of writing. When a student
submits an essay for scoring, the system immediately measures the
meaning of the essay. It then compares the essay to the training essays,
looking for similarities and assigns a holistic score in part
by placing the essay in a category with the most similar training
essays. Analytic scoring occurs in much the same way. For each trait,
the system assesses that trait in the student essay, compares it to
the training essays, and then categorizes the trait in question.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. How does the Essay Component scoring compare
to the way teachers grade writing?
The Essay Component's approach mirrors the way that teachers grade essays.
For example, when teachers evaluate a student's essay, they look for
characteristics that identify an essay as an A or C paper. Their
expectations are likely based on their previous experience as a grader
and on criteria for the assignment in question. In other words,
teachers search for a match between the essay itself and the criteria
for a particular grade or score. The Essay Component
is trained to mimic this process.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. How does the Essay Component score essays with
highly unusual writing styles?
An essay with a highly unique writing style or unusual construction
may receive an advisory message along with a score. If an essay is
off-topic, written in a language other than English, too brief or too
repetitive, a written refusal to write, or otherwise incomprehensible,
a student will receive an advisory that his or her essay can not be
scored. These advisory messages ask the student to discuss the essay
and all feedback with his or her teacher to ensure an appropriate
evaluation of the writing.
|
Return to Top
|
|
Q. What type of feedback do students receive on their essays?
Students receive a variety of feedback on their essays, including a
holistic score and analytic scores on different writing traits.
Students also receive feedback on spelling, grammar and repetition,
as well as length of their essays. Click
here for an example of
student feedback.
|
Return to Top
|
 |
| |